One of the future unique facets of BBOA will be establishing a fair and comprehensive method of evaluating our officials. We will pride ourselves going forward on ensuring that each of our officials gets an evaluation or observation at least once per year. As such, we have formulated a mission statement for our evaluation committee:
“Provide all members of BBOA with at least one yearly observation or evaluation with feedback to assist in their continual development, as well as define the level of play individuals are qualified to officiate. “
To accomplish this, we have created the Evaluation and Feedback Committee. Below, you will find an overview of the committee process along with a description of the evaluation criteria and tier structure. The feedback you receive will provide both you and our assignors with a snapshot of your current status and a guideline for moving forward.
If you have any questions about the process, feel free to contact a committee member. They can be found at BBOAFRED.COM.
The committee looks forward to working with you.
BBOA will evaluate officials through many avenues, such as mini camps, scrimmages, fall leagues, and regular-season games. It is highly recommended that you participate in as many as possible to improve your officiating.
The Evaluation Process
BBOA will utilize a tier ranking system. Every official will be given a tier placement, which will determine the level of play and/or the officiating level they are qualified to officiate. The Assigning Committee will utilize this tier ranking during the season. The tier structure and a description of the elements used for evaluation are listed below.
FAQ
Will every official be evaluated/need to be evaluated?
Yes, all officials will be evaluated. If the Assigning Committee has concerns about an official’s tier determination being too low or too high, the official will be re-evaluated when opportunities arise.
Can I appeal my ranking?
If you feel you were not evaluated at the proper level, you should contact the Evaluation Committee Chair to request an updated evaluation. Any appeal will incur a $25.00 fee, which will be deducted from your year-end payment.
Will the tier system be explained?
Below is the overall breakdown of the tier structure, along with a description of the elements used for evaluation purposes. As stated previously, every official will receive written feedback. It is our goal to give every official a document that can provide a roadmap for improvement. The evaluation will include your strengths and constructive feedback that will help officials reach the level to which they feel they belong.
The tier placements are meant to serve as a guide for the assignments team. You are not guaranteed a certain level of game; this guide just states that you are eligible.
Tier Ranking Descriptions for BBOA
Tier: Description of Expected Capabilities and Opportunities
100 – Able to officiate as the Crew Chief at every level of play. Considered for up to State Level Assignments.
150 – Can officiate all levels of the game; able to officiate as the Crew Chief at every level of play, Considered for up State Quarter Finals
200 – Able to officiate at all levels of play; can serve as Crew Chief for all Girls Games and the majority of Boys Games.
300 – Able to officiate all levels of play; Serve as a Crew Chief for any games except Varsity Boys.
350 – Able to officiate all levels of play; Serve as a Crew Chief for Middle School and JV games
400 – Able to officiate as U1/U2 for single A and private school games. A Crew Chief may be on all Middle School, Freshman, and JV games.
450 – Able to officiate in parks and recreation, middle school, freshman and junior, and some private school varsity games.
500 – Able to officiate middle school, freshmen, JV, and middle school.
Evaluation Elements (5 Total)
Appearance & Court Presence
Do you know if the official is physically fit for the game assigned?
Is the officials’ uniform adequately sized?
Does he or she carry himself/herself with good posture and look like they belong on the court?
Is he/she concerned with the game without paying attention to themselves?
Is he/she confident without being perceived as arrogant?
Judgment & Application of Rules
Are rules correctly applied?
Are calls correct?
Can officials differentiate between incidental and illegal contact?
Is officiating consistent within the crew?
Are non-calls made when legal play occurs, even though something may “look bad?”
Game Management/Communication
Is illegal action called throughout the game, or does the allowed level of contact change during the game?
Are potential problems between players recognized and addressed before they escalate into technical foul situations?
Are coaches addressed when needed and warned for inappropriate behavior, not only with the head coach but with the assistant(s) and players?
Is inappropriate bench behavior allowed to continue?
Are officials aware of the game clock, multiple free throws, and deadball situations and communicate clearly with the table?
Does each official communicate with his crew members during foul calls and prior to the inbounding ball?
Hustle and Work Ethic
Are officials able to keep up with the pace of play?
Can officials get into position to see through the offense and the defense?
Are officials purposeful in their movements?
Do officials administer free throws and throw-ins in a timely fashion?
Mechanics
Does the official know his areas of coverage and responsibility for the ball position?
Does the official watch off-ball, or does he always keep his eye on the ball?
Does the official always use proper signals?
Is the official confident and strong with his or her signals?
Is the official believable and clear in his or her foul call reporting techniques?
Does the official cover the floor as needed in relation to his or her co-officials?
Are rotations done at the proper time?
Is the official watching competitive matchups?
Copyright Battlefield Basketball Officials Association © 2024. All rights reserved.